A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Month: September 2024

Je suis une légende 2 : Will Smith confirme enfin cette rumeur qui existe depuis 10 ans

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Comment le personnage principal de Je suis une légende peut-il être de retour dans la suite alors qu'il est mort à la fin du premier film ? Will Smith explique le pourquoi du comment et confirme une vieille rumeur.

Sorti en 2007, Je suis une légende avait été un beau succès pour Will Smith, le film ayant récolté 585 millions de dollars de recettes mondiales pour un budget de 150 millions. Considérée comme un classique du genre post-apocalyptique, cette adaptation du roman de Richard Matheson a marqué les esprits.

Depuis 2012, des rumeurs de suite circulaient à Hollywood mais rien de concret n’avait été annoncé. 10 ans plus tard, en 2022, le scénariste et producteur Akiva Goldsman révélait que le projet Je suis une légende 2 était lancé avec le retour de Will Smith accompagné de Michael B. Jordan. Francis Lawrence devrait également reprendre son fauteuil de réalisateur mais rien n’est encore acté.

Je suis une légende

Sortie :

19 décembre 2007

|
1h 40min

De
Francis Lawrence

Avec
Will Smith,
Alice Braga,
Charlie Tahan

Presse
3,1

Spectateurs
3,8

Voir sur Netflix

Dès lors, les fans se posaient la légitime question : comment Robert Neville (Will Smith) pourrait-il être de retour dans cette suite, sachant que le personnage meurt à la fin du premier volet ?

Dans l’œuvre originale, Will Smith tient donc le rôle de Robert Neville, un savant mystérieusement immunisé contre un virus qui décime la population et la transforme en mutants.

Dernier homme vivant à New York, le scientifique tente de se consacrer tout entier à sa mission : venir à bout du virus, en annuler les terribles effets en se servant de son propre sang.

Comment ressusciter Will Smith ?

À la fin du film, Robert Neville passait l’arme à gauche, ce qui annihilait toutes chances de le voir revenir pour une suite éventuelle. En 2019, Francis Lawrence déclarait au micro du podcast Happy Sad Confused :

“Warner voulait vraiment en faire un autre, mais je ne voyais pas ce que l’on pouvait faire. J’y ai réfléchi et je suis arrivé à la conclusion que les gens voulaient voir le dernier homme sur Terre, alors on leur avait montré le dernier homme sur Terre.”

Click Here: brisbane lions jersey

“Mais comme il meurt à la fin, on ne pouvait pas faire autre chose avec lui. Qui plus est, je pense que les spectateurs ne sont pas attachés au personnage comme ils peuvent l’être avec un Indiana Jones. Ce n’est pas le genre d’icône qui pourrait revenir encore et encore”, avait-il affirmé.

“Je trouvais ça un peu poussif d’en faire un préquel, ça aurait beaucoup ressemblé à Contagion. Et en faire une suite avec Robert Neville n’aurait de toute façon pas été possible, ou alors il fallait faire quelque chose de vraiment stupide, du genre ‘des scientifiques ont récupéré son ADN et ont réussi à le recréer.’ Ça aurait été complètement idiot, alors j’ai préféré tirer ma révérence”, avait martelé Francis Lawrence.

Will Smith confirme les rumeurs sur la fin alternative

Toutefois, le réalisateur n’avait pas pensé à une autre solution. Pour rendre cette suite possible, la rumeur affirmait depuis 10 ans que le scénariste Akiva Goldsman allait utiliser la fin alternative de l’histoire, présente dans les bonus du blu-ray/DVD du premier film.

Cette information a été confirmée par Will Smith en personne lors du Festival International du Film de la Mer Rouge.

“J’ai un appel avec Michael B. Jordan, demain”, confiait l’acteur au moment de sa prise de parole. “Nous sommes très proches, le scénario vient d’arriver. Je donne probablement trop d’informations.

Il faut être un vrai mordu de Je suis une légende pour le savoir, mais dans la version cinéma, mon personnage meurt, alors que sur le DVD, il y a une version alternative de la fin où mon personnage survit. Nous suivons la mythologie de la version DVD. Je ne peux rien vous dire de plus, mais Michael B. Jordan est de la partie”, a révélé Will Smith.

Que se passe-t-il dans cette fin alternative ?

Au lieu de se jeter sur les infectés avec une grenade, Neville comprend que ces derniers sont venus récupérer la femme sur laquelle il est en train de faire des expériences. Le scientifique ouvre la porte et remet cette dernière aux siens.

Les infectés quittent alors le laboratoire en laissant Robert en vie. Ce dernier prend la route aux côtés d’Anna (Alice Braga) et Ethan (Charlie Tahan) en direction de Bethel dans le Vermont.

I Am Legend 2

Avec
Will Smith,
Michael B. Jordan

Dans cette version, Neville n’a pas trouvé l’antidote mais il reste en vie. Ce dénouement, complètement ouvert, servira donc de point de départ au second volet. Dans cette fin alternative, la question du Bien et du Mal était plus nuancée.

Robert Neville découvrait que le leader des infectés cherchait juste à retrouver la femme qu’il retenait dans son laboratoire, pas à la tuer. Neville comprenait alors qu’il était devenu un monstre à leurs yeux, ce qui le poussait à abandonner ses recherches pour trouver un remède, et partir en quête d’une colonie de survivants.

Je suis une légende 2 n’a pas encore de date de sortie annoncée ; il ne devrait toutefois pas arriver dans les salles obscures avant 2025. En attendant, on retrouvera Will Smith dans Bad Boys 4 le 12 juin prochain.

Title Match, The Hardys In Action And More Announced For TNA iMPACT On September 12

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

The TNA Victory Road 2024 “go-home show” goes down next Thursday night, September 12.

During the post-Emergence 2024 episode of TNA iMPACT on AXS TV and TNA+ on September 5, the company quickly switched gears and began focusing on the upcoming TNA Victory Road show on September 13.

On next week’s episode of TNA iMPACT on 9/12, it will be ABC defending their TNA Tag-Team Championships against First Class duo AJ Francis and KC Navarro.

Additionally, the 9/12 show next week will feature The Hardys in action, as Jeff Hardy and Matt Hardy continue their quest to capture TNA tag-team gold when they challenge number one contenders from The System, Brian Myers and Eddie Edwards.

–>

–>

Click Here: nsw blues jersey

Yellen rules out bailout for Silicon Valley Bank: “We’re not going to do that again”

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Click:财务发票识别 腾讯

Washington — Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Sunday that the federal government will not provide a bailout for Silicon Valley Bank’s investors after the bank was abruptly shuttered, but said financial regulators are “concerned” about the impact to depositors and working to address their needs.

“During the financial crisis, there were investors and owners of systemic large banks that were bailed out,” Yellen said in an interview with “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “And the reforms that have been put in place means that we’re not going to do that again. But we are concerned about depositors and are focused on trying to meet their needs.” 

Transcript: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on “Face the Nation”

On Sunday, the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and FDIC said the government will be guaranteeing deposits for SVB account holders. “Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer,” according to a joint statement released by the agencies.

The Federal Reserve on Sunday also announced the creation of a new Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) to make additional funding available “to eligible depository institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors,” according to a press release. “This action will bolster the capacity of the banking system to safeguard deposits and ensure the ongoing provision of money and credit to the economy.”

California regulators shut down Silicon Valley Bank on Friday after depositors rushed to withdraw money last week amid concerns about its balance sheet. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was appointed receiver, and regulators are working to find a buyer for the institution, which ranked as the 16th-largest bank in the U.S. before its failure.

The collapse of the 40-year-old bank, which catered to the tech industry, is the largest of a financial institution since the failure of Washington Mutual in 2008.

President Biden spoke with California Gov. Gavin Newsom about Silicon Valley Bank and the federal response on Saturday, and the FDIC spoke with members of the California congressional delegation late Saturday night. 

Yellen said that in the wake of Silicon Valley Bank’s failure, Treasury officials have been hearing from depositors, many of which are small businesses, and she has been working with bank regulators to “design appropriate policies” to address the situation, though she declined to provide further details. The FDIC, she said, is likely considering a “range of available options” to stabilize the situation, which could include an acquisition by a foreign bank. 

“The American banking system is really safe and well-capitalized. It’s resilient,” she said. “In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, new controls were put in place, better capital and liquidity supervision, and it was tested during the early days of the pandemic and proved its resilience. So Americans can have confidence in the safety and soundness of our banking system.”

Still, Silicon Valley Bank’s shutdown has prompted nervousness about whether it could trigger a run on other small and regional banks. Yellen, though, said financial regulators are working to prevent the fallout from spreading to other institutions.

“We want to make sure that the troubles that exist at one bank don’t create contagion to others that are sound,” she said. “The goal always of supervision and regulation is to make sure that contagion can’t occur.”

In its joint statement, the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and FDIC said measures were being taken to address the closure of another bank. “We are also announcing a similar systemic risk exception for Signature Bank, New York, New York, which was closed today by its state chartering authority. All depositors of this institution will be made whole.  As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer,” the statement reads.

Following the closure of Silicon Valley Bank, the FDIC said it created the Deposit Insurance National Bank of Santa Clara, to which insured deposits from Silicon Valley Bank were immediately transferred. All insured depositors will have access to their insured deposits by Monday morning, while uninsured depositors will receive an advance dividend within the next week, the FDIC said. Future dividend payments may be made to uninsured depositors as the FDIC sells Silicon Valley Bank’s assets.

As of the end of 2022, Silicon Valley Bank had roughly $209 billion in total assets and about $174.5 billion in total deposits, according to the agency.

But more than 85% of Silicon Valley Bank’s deposits were uninsured, according to estimates in a recent regulatory filing. 

“We’re very aware of the problems that depositors will have,” Yellen said. “Many of them are small businesses that employ people across the country, and of course this is a significant concern and [we’re] working with regulators to try to address these concerns.”

Click Here: LONGCHAMP LE PLIAGE XTRA VANITY XS BLUE WOMEN

Trending News

Yellen rules out bailout for SVB: “We’re not going to do that again”

Transcript: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on “Face the Nation,” March 12, 2023

Full transcript of “Face the Nation” on March 12, 2023

Yellen rules out bailout for SVB

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

.component–type-recirculation .item:nth-child(5) {
display: none;
}

#inline-recirc-item–id-ab5d9b67-bf13-49a0-98df-e0dcc008fa60, #right-rail-recirc-item–id-ab5d9b67-bf13-49a0-98df-e0dcc008fa60 {
display: none;
}

#inline-recirc-item–id-ab5d9b67-bf13-49a0-98df-e0dcc008fa60 ~ .item:nth-child(5) {
display: block;
}
In:
Janet Yellen

Frantic woman in police custody explains her stained clothes: “This is Andrew’s blood”

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

In the predawn hours of May 8, 2014, Stephanie Fernandes was desperate to learn from police what had happened to her fiancé, Andrew “Andy” Wagner.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES (crying): I — I don’t know what’s gonna happen. Please.

OFFICER PERO: Stephanie, just —

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Please, tell me if he’s OK.

OFFICER PERO: Stephanie —

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Please, no 

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: This is like a nightmare, a walking nightmare …

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: …what happened to him I can’t take it.

OFFICER PERO: I know this is, I know this is a traumatic night, OK?

STEPHANIE: No, no. Please tell me Andy’s OK.

OFFICER PERO: We have to get through this, OK?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Oh, please tell me Andy’s OK, please … 

At around 10:30 the night before, after a sudden bloody encounter with Andy at their home in Worcester, Massachusetts, Stephanie says she couldn’t find her cell phone, so she rushed to a neighbors’ house to get help.

Angelina Fernandes (driving with Peter Van Sant to her former home): It’s coming up on the left.

Peter Van Sant: Which house?

Angelina Fernandes: Right here on the left.

Stephanie’s daughter Angelina Fernandes now 20, was just 11 years old that night.

Peter Van Sant: Where was your bedroom?

Angelina Fernandes: Um, I don’t know, upstairs.

Peter Van Sant: But can you still remember.

Angelina Fernandes: Yeah, it’s like pictures.

Angelina Fernandes: So, I was sleeping, and I heard the door slam shut, and it woke me up. And then I just heard my mom from outside, “Help me, someone help me.” And then I just hear my mom screaming and crying.

Peter Van Sant: When you looked from that balcony down and could see your mother and Andy –

Angelina Fernandes: Mm-hmm (affirms) … there’s blood everywhere.

Angelina Fernandes:  And then I saw them giving CPR on him.

Angelina Fernandes: I just remember my mom. … And then she spotted me upstairs and she pointed at me, and she was like, “Someone get her, someone get my daughter!”

Police took Angelina to a relative’s house. Andy was rushed by paramedics to the hospital. Police took Stephanie to the station, where she was led into an interrogation room and interviewed for almost three hours.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: No. No. Please tell me Andy’s OK.

OFFICER PERO: We have to get through this, OK?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Oh, please tell me Andy’s OK … I can’t even talk. Like, he’s my life. It doesn’t even matter. Like, I love him so much …

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Please. I don’t—no, no. I don’t know what to do. Like,

I’m gonna freak out …

OFFICER: Sit down for a second.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I don’t wanna hear nothin’. I don’t wanna hear nothin’. And if anything bad happened to my family, no, please don’t tell me. I know I look psycho. Please.

OFFICER PERO: Stephanie —

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Please.

OFFICER PERO: —  just for right now, I just want to get some basic information.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: OK.

Detective William Pero led the questioning

OFFICER PERO: Before we talk about the incident that occurred tonight, I have to read you your rights. 

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: OK.

OFFICER PERO: You have the right to use a telephone to … contact an attorney. Do you understand this right Stephanie?

OFFICER PERO: Right now, we can’t talk to Andrew. I can talk to you, OK.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Why can’t you talk to him?

The officers press on, telling Stephanie that Wagner is in the hospital. Stephanie appears to settle down a bit.

OFFICER PERO: Well, something did happen. You’re covered in blood.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I know. No. Oh yeah …

OFFICER PERO: You have a lotta blood on you and that’s, I would assume that’s Andrew’s blood?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Yes. This is Andrew’s blood.

Stephanie changes into a white coverall. And two hours into her interview finally learns Andy’s fate.

OFFICER PERO: Andrew is no longer with us. And there’s a reason why that happened, but we don’t know that reason yet.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Oh my God. Oh my God.

Stephanie is told Andy is dead. She begins to reveal details of what happened that night.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: What happened was we got into an altercation, and he was hitting me. And that’s what happened. And he pulled out a knife and guns. … He started like choking me and hittin’ me and stuff.

An autopsy would later reveal Wagner had bled to death after being stabbed in the neck. Stephanie was later charged with first-degree murder.

Stephanie Fernandes is talking publicly for the first time about the death of her fiancé Andrew Wagner.

Stephanie Fernandes: I never, never, and never would kill someone, harm someone in that way, on purpose.

Stephanie Fernandes: I will always love him.

But how did it come to this? Just five years earlier Stephanie was smitten with Andrew Wagner.

Stephanie Fernandes: Blue eyes, really nice smile, … Nice hair. … just really handsome and

Um, really fun personality, very talkative.

Peter Van Sant: And did you feel an attraction to him right away?

Stephanie Fernandes: Yes, I did. We had chemistry, a lot.

At the time, Andy worked at the tire shop of a Costco. He dreamed of working in law enforcement. In the beginning, Angelina got along with him.

Peter Van Sant: What kind of things would — did you guys do together?

Angelina Fernandes: We used to watch “Criminal Minds” together.

Peter Van Sant: Did your mom ever tell you … “Angelina, I, I love Andrew, I — I’d like to — I’d like to marry Andrew someday?”

Angelina Fernandes: Yes. She wanted that so bad. … a stable family for me and her. … She just — she wanted that.

But what Angelina didn’t know at the time was that her mother’s life with Andy Wagner also had a violent side, recalled Stephanie’s friend Danielle Lord.

Danielle Lord: She constantly had, like, grab marks on her arms. She had marks on her inside of her legs, like I have never seen in my life.

A VOLATILE RELATIONSHIP

Angelina Fernandes (referencing a photo with her mother): The little girl is me, and my mom is next to me, Stephanie Fernandes. … so tender and loving and … She was high energy and — I was like her little sidekick.

Angelina was just 6 years old when Andrew Wagner came into her life. She remembers good times at the beach, family gatherings and vacations.

Angelina Fernandes: We would actually go to Cape Cod every summer to his parent’s Cape house, which was fun.

Angelina Fernandes: She loved him. She wanted a house with him. She wanted to get married to him. She wanted babies.

In those early times, Angelina says her mom never said how she met Andy Wagner and never revealed what she did for a living that kept her away at night.

Danielle Lord: She was beautiful. … she just had these piercing eyes, first, that you notice. And her hair was just beautiful.

Danielle Lord worked with Stephanie in a Massachusetts night club.

Danielle Lord: We both were very intimidating. A lot of men would say that we were intimidating, especially together. That’s attractive to men. … We just became this kind of duo.

Peter Van Sant: What did you do at the nightclub?

Stephanie Fernandes: I was a topless dancer.

Peter Van Sant: Exotic dancer –

Stephanie Fernandes: Exotic dancer, stripper, yeah.

Peter Van Sant: And had you been trained in dancing at all?

Stephanie Fernandes: I took dance classes when I was younger, not in that way.

Stephanie was a single mom.  She says after she split up with Angelina’s father, she needed to earn a paycheck.

Stephanie Fernandes: I would go in there, make a lotta money, and then I would get out

And — and be there for my mom … and my daughter.

One night, back in 2009, a new guy at the club caught her eye.

Stephanie Fernandes: I was on stage. And he was there                           

Stephanie Fernandes: We just started talking and talked for, like, an hour.

Danielle Lord: She was instantly attracted to him. She wanted to be with him. She didn’t look at him like a customer. She was like, “Oh, this is a cute guy. I like him.”

At first, Stephanie loved the attention.

Stephanie Fernandes: I thought, “Oh he’s just into me. He just really likes me.”

Danielle Lord: I think she just had stars in her eyes.

Danielle says Stephanie and Andy’s relationship quickly became a little obsessive.

Danielle Lord: A lot of alarms went off whenever Steph met Andy. And — you know, alarms that she couldn’t hear. … He was completely … possessive right from the beginning. Andy was calling her nonstop, messaging her … and showing up at the club right from the beginning.

Stephanie and Andy moved in together almost immediately in Worcester, Massachusetts.

Danielle says their relationship moved from obsessive to dangerous.

Danielle Lord: I’ve never in my life seen bruises like that ever. And I don’t — I don’t even wanna think of what she went through to get the — those bruises. … We were covering it with makeup. … when she had the bruising down there, there was nothing you could do to cover it.

Soon after moving in together, Stephanie says, Andrew demanded some changes.

Peter Van Sant: Did he demand that you stop dancing?

Stephanie Fernandes: Oh, yeah. Yes. … His girl was not gonna dance at a club. And I said, jokingly, nervously, jokingly, “Well who’s gonna pay my bills?”

Peter Van Sant: And why did he want you to quit?

Stephanie Fernandes: Because of the attention, the men … taking off my top in front of men.

Stephanie says she stopped dancing, but the violence continued.

Stephanie Fernandes: He’s hit me in my head and my face.  He’s choked me …

Stephanie says she took this photo of her black eye, shown above, in 2010.

Stephanie Fernandes: Oh, body shots. All over the place. My mouth. My eyes. Everywhere.

Peter Van Sant: Why didn’t you ever call the police and report this violence?

Stephanie Fernandes: I was told that bullets can go through paper. It would mean nothin’ with a restraining order. He would get to me way quicker than the cops would. And just — I would die if I left him.

Danielle Lord: I can’t explain it. It’s very hard to leave a domestic violence situation. … You don’t have your own money. You don’t have anywhere to go. … you know, you’re broken down completely. … Your brain is like scrambled eggs, and you can’t think for yourself. And you just walk around every day like … you’re in shock. … You just wanna end the day, and when you wake up the next day, it’s just another day doing the same thing. So … I think she was just stuck in a situation that she didn’t know how to get out of.

In spite of their volatile relationship, in 2012, Stephanie and Andy were engaged. A short time later, Andy became a corrections officer.

Peter Van Sant: You and Andy had bought a condo together. You were planning a wedding, correct?

Stephanie Fernandes: Yes.

Peter Van Sant (hands photo to Stephanie): You seem happy in that picture. What went wrong?

Stephanie Fernandes: Severe jealousy.

But Stephanie admits it wasn’t just Andy. Sometimes she antagonized him, teasing and tormenting him with texts.

Peter Van Sant: They’re pretty vicious.

Stephanie Fernandes: Yeah.

Peter Van Sant: You admit that, right?

Stephanie Fernandes: I do. It’s embarrassing.

Van Sant asked Stephanie to read a few.

Stephanie Fernandes: “I’m gonna F your best friend.” “You should kill yourself.” “Hope a car falls on you.”

Stephanie Fernandes: I admit I’m flawed. … Yeah, I can get upset.

She says Andrew would get upset too — especially when she wore outfits that might make her attractive to other men.

Stephanie Fernandes: He’s freaked out over … the tank top that I was wearing, grabbed me, and then threw me on my bed in the room, and tore it off. Took out his gun, made sure I knew there was bullets it in, and jammed it down my throat.

Peter Van Sant: Did he threaten to kill you? Did he threaten to pull the trigger?

Stephanie Fernandes: If I — during that time — it was if I didn’t listen to him, yes that he was gonna kill me.

Angelina Fernandes: When he was mad, he’d turn into a different person. His whole face would get red. His pupils would dilate. It was like possession of demonic entity.

Angelina recalls seeing Andrew trying to headbutt her mother.

Angelina Fernandes: He’d go like — like that (demonstrating a headbutt).

Peter Van Sant: Would he bump her? When he headbutt –

Angelina Fernandes: No.

Peter Van Sant:  — would he literally make contact?

Angelina Fernandes: No.

Peter Van Sant: But it would go right up in her face?

Angelina Fernandes: Yeah.

Peter Van Sant: And –                                   

Angelina Fernandes: Yeah.

Peter Van Sant: And she called that a headbutt, right?

Angelina Fernandes: Yeah.

Peter Van Sant: And did that bother her

Angelina Fernandes: Mm-hmm (affirms).

By early 2013 Stephanie decided she and Angelina needed a change. She left Andrew and began a new relationship with an old boyfriend, Mike Laramee.

Stephanie Fernandes: I left Andy to get away from the abuse and a number of things.

Stephanie says both men knew about each other.

Stephanie Fernandes: What I did with Andy, Mike knew about. What I did with Mike, Andy knew about.

She says Mike treated her very well.

Stephanie Fernandes: He spoiled me in every way. … He would carry me into bed if I fell asleep on the couch.

And just months after they got back together, Mike proposed, and Stephanie accepted.

Stephanie Fernandes: Mike brought me to Niagara Falls. … he did take out … the ring and

asked if I would marry him. … And I did wear the ring.

Peter Van Sant: Both men knew that you were engaged to the other man?

Stephanie Fernandes: Yes.

About a month later, Laramee says he broke off the engagement. Stephanie got back together with Andy, but she says it was more out of fear than love. 

Stephanie Fernandes: If I didn’t go back with Andy … he woulda killed Mike or definitely myself if I didn’t go back with him. He never woulda let me live.

Once Stephanie was back, she says the cycle of abuse resumed. Just three days before his death, Andy texted her.

Peter Van Sant: He said, “I’m going to f****** kill you.” Do you remember him texting that to you?

Stephanie Fernandes: I remember him texting that, saying that all the time.

Then, on the night of May 7, 2014, everything exploded.

Angelina was upstairs in bed. Stephanie says she was in the kitchen preparing dinner when Andy started an argument about what she’d been doing that week while he was away at work.

Stephanie Fernandes: That’s what started … the questions … what have I been doing all week, things like that — just escalated.

She says Andy wanted to have sex. Stephanie didn’t.

Stephanie Fernandes: He was punchin’ me in the head. Tryin’ to pin me down. Tryin’ to remove my pants.

Then, she says, he pulled out a gun and tried to pin her against the couch.

Stephanie Fernandes: I was in fear of my life. I was trying to get away.

Stephanie says she grabbed a knife to scare him. What unfolded would soon end one life and destroy another.

Stephanie Fernandes: It just was so quick. He just charged at me, went to headbutt me, as he always would do.

Peter Van Sant: How are you holding the knife?

Stephanie Fernandes (holds a pen to demonstrate): Like this.

Peter Van Sant: Show me. So, you have it up. And he’s coming at you, right?

Stephanie Fernandes: Yeah.

Peter Van Sant: And what happens?

Stephanie Fernandes: That’s when I’m like, “Stay away from me, stay away from me” as he’s screaming, “I’m gonna f****** kill you.” He’s on the other side. And he goes to grab my hand. … and it must have nicked his neck, the one-and-a-half- or two-and-a-half-inch, whatever it was.

Peter Van Sant: You held the knife that cut your fiancé’s artery and he bled to death. And people would think, well, you murdered him.

Stephanie Fernandes: My actions led to him dying. They did. But I didn’t make a decision to take his life. I did not want that to happen but if it wasn’t him, that would have been me in the ground.

WHAT HAPPENED THE NIGHT OF MAY 7, 2014?

As Stephanie Fernandes’ trial finally approached, her legal team prepared her defense.

Maura Tansley: Domestic violence or intimate partner violence was central to the entire case.

Maura Tansley was one of Fernandes’ attorneys.

Maura Tansley: It set up the nature of the relationship between these two people and I think raised questions about what happened … that night that Mr. Wagner died.

The trial had been delayed by procedural arguments, and then the COVID pandemic.

Stephanie had spent those years in home custody, wearing an ankle bracelet. In June 2022, eight years after Andrew Wagner was killed, the murder trial of Stephanie Fernandes finally began.

Andrew Wagner’s family was there. His mother Melissa, his father Tom, and his sister Jillian Cristaldi. They declined “48 Hours”‘ request for an interview. Surrounded by supporters, they were hoping that by the end of this trial, Fernandes would be behind bars.

In his opening statement, prosecutor Terry McLaughlin said Stephanie Fernandes stabbed her fiancé, Andrew Wagner, in the neck, cutting an artery and killing him. McLaughlin says that Stephanie told different stories about what exactly happened that night. She said, “He was waving a gun around, so I stabbed him.” And to a neighbor she said, “He hit me, so I hit him.” And McLaughlin said Stephanie had fits of rage and that she was the aggressor.

Lead defense attorney Peter Ettenberg told jurors that Andrew Wagner was quote “189 pounds of fury and frustration” who violently came at Stephanie and said, “I’m going to kill you.” Ettenberg says Stephanie thought she would be killed, so she acted to protect herself.

Peter Ettenberg: We believe that when he grabbed her hands and went to go and headbutt her, he pulled and that pulled the knife into his neck.

But prosecutors presented witnesses who testified Stephanie has a long history of violent outbursts.

ASSISTANT DA JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: How many times did you see Ms. Fernandes strike Mr. Wagner?

DANIEL DISTEFANO: Multiple times, ma’am.

Daniel DiStefano was a friend of Wagner’s and a former police officer. He says he saw Fernandes hit Andy at a wedding reception back in 2010.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: And can you please tell the court where Ms. Fernandes hit Mr. Wagner?

DANIEL DISTEFANO: She very precisely struck him in the face and the head with a closed fist.

Peter Van Sant: Do you admit that, at times, you have hit men in your life with a closed fist?

Stephanie Fernandes: Hit?

Peter Van Sant: Hit them.

Stephanie Fernandes: No, I hit, well, yeah, I hit Andy once. … He punched me in the head I punched him back.

And Stephanie’s former fiancé, Mike Laramee, testified. He told the court that Stephanie pulled a knife on him at his home. This is audio of Laramee’s testimony.

MIKE LARAMEE: All of a sudden, I heard a ching of a knife coming out of the butcher block. And I came inside, and I hit it out of her hand.

And there was another knife incident.

MIKE LARAMEE: She went to my dining room table. And she was gonna carve it up. And I was afraid for my life. I grabbed a chair. And I wasn’t gonna let her come near me with it. … And she stabbed the chair with it like three or four times.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: After this happened, what, if anything, did you do?

MIKE LARAMEE: I grabbed all the knives. And I got rid of ’em.

Stephanie Fernandes: The things, that, like, Mike Laramee said are not true.

Peter Van Sant: You never came after Michael Laramee with a knife in your hand?

Stephanie Fernandes: I never did.

Peter Van Sant: You never damaged his furniture with a knife?

Stephanie Fernandes: No. I did not.

As Stephanie’s defense began, they called an unusual witness.

OFFICER PERO: My name is William Pero … I’m a Worcester police sergeant

The detective who interviewed her the night Andrew died.  The defense showed the jury that police video — a video the prosecutors had decided not to show. In that interview, Detective Pero points out Stephanie’s bruises.

OFFICER PERO (police video): I look at the bruises on you, OK? And they’re not old —

STEPHANIE FERNANDES (sitting on floor crying): Please tell me he’s OK —

OFFICER PERO: — and they’re not old bruises. I mean, they’re fresh.

Maura Tansley: The fact that there are fresh bruises on her … that’s consistent with how she described Andrew Wagner grabbing her and coming towards her, I don’t know what else … would be better to lay the foundation that she was acting in self-defense.

OFFICER PERO (police video): You have bruises on your face, on your arm, on your body. … I can see them, Steph.

Prosecutors show Pero photos taken that night. He says he sees a bruise on her arm, but not on Stephanie’s face.

TERRY MCLAUGHLIN (showing pictures) And do you see any injuries to the defendant’s face in this photograph?

PETER ETTENBERG: Objection judge.

JUDGE: Overruled.

OFFICER PERO: I do not.

TERRY MCLAUGHLIN: And do you see any injuries to the face of the defendant in this photograph?

OFFICER PERO: I do not.

The prosecutor suggests that during that interview he may have been playing Stephanie.

TERRY MCLAUGHLIN: Some of your questions or comments are designed to get the person you are interviewing to drop their guard and or talk to you, correct?

OFFICER PERO: To show empathy and to, to relate to me.

PROSECUTOR: You want them to start talking, correct?

OFFICER PERO: I do.

Two people fought that night back in 2014 and only one survived. The defense decided they had no choice but to put Stephanie on the stand.

Her defense attorneys walked her through the hours leading up to Andy’s death.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: We tried bein’ intimate.

DEFENSE ATTORNEY MAURA TANSLEY: That morning?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Yes.

MAURA TANSLEY: OK. And did it happen?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: No.

She says Andy became angry when she made fun of him.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I made the comment as I got outta bed, walkin’ into my bathroom. And he came in there and smacked me a few times.

Later that evening, with Angelina upstairs in bed, Stephanie says Andy with a gun in hand, attacked her. 

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Hit me in the head with the gun. Choked me. And he wanted … sex. Somehow, we were on the floor, and I was cryin’ and … I ended up gettin’ away … and I ran screaming and away, like, “Don’t come near me. Don’t come near me.” And he was screamin’, “I’m gonna kill you, you f*****’ bitch.” When I ran and I kept on sayin’, “Don’t come near me. Don’t come near me,” I— I—

DEFENSE ATTORNEY MAURA TANSLEY: Did he, did he listen to you when you said that? Or did he keep coming near you?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES (crying): It happened so quick where I ran to the kitchen … I picked up a knife and held it and said, “Don’t” like, screaming, anyways, the whole time, “Don’t come near me. Don’t come near me.” Andy, um, ran right to me and said, “Give me the knife, you f*****’ bitch”, and put his hand on my throat, and grabbed my hand, and went to headbutt me … and he went, “Steph, I think I got stabbed.” I just stood there I was in shock. I— we — I think we both were in shock.

THE CASE AGAINST STEPHANIE FERNANDES

After Stephanie Fernandes took the stand and told her version of events, the prosecutors got their turn to challenge her as Assistant DA Julieanne Karcasinas zeroed in on Stephanie’s history with men.

ASSISTANT DA JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: You claim that you were a loyal woman. Isn’t that correct?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Correct.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Now were you loyal to Andy when you cheated on him with Mike?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I don’t –

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Yes, or no?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I didn’t cheat on him.

Mike was Mike Laramee.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Now July 26th, 2013, you were in Niagara Falls. Isn’t that correct?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Correct.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: And you accept a $44,000 engagement ring from Mr. Laramee while on that trip. Isn’t that correct?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: That is correct. … I put it on my finger, yes.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Do you get engaged to all your guy friends?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: No.

On Stephanie’s second day on the stand, the prosecutor tried to pick apart her account of the day Andy died.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Ms. Fernandes, how many times did Andy choke you that day on May 7th, 2014?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: That day?

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Yes.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: In the, in the morning and … at the nighttime of the event.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: And then how long did he choke you for that morning?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I’m not sure. I didn’t count. I’m not sure. It was quick.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: And you had no marks on your neck?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I don’t remember.

Stephanie had described a struggle around the couch in the house that night. But the Assistant DA says the crime scene pictures don’t show any sign of that.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: The coffee table was in front of the couch on then —

JULIANNE KARCASINAS: Yes.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: —  at our house, yes.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Yes, and it’s not pushed out of the way, correct?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I can’t tell with that couch and how close the couch and coffee table is, but it does not look crooked.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Correct, it’s not pushed to the side or anything like that.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: How was he choking you on the couch?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: At one – it — all happened so quick.

And Karcasinas tries to cast doubt on Fernandes’ recollection of the night.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: So, you do not have a memory of certain parts of that evening, isn’t that correct?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: I would say that’s correct, like, the time and stuff like that.

And finally, Karcasinas questioned Stephanie’s credibility, especially her claims that she had lived her life in fear of Andy Wagner.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: Were you afraid of Andy Wagner when you told him he was stupid?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Yes.

JULIANNE KARCASINAS: Were you in fear of Mr. Wagner when you said to him, “I hope a car falls on you”?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: No.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: And were you in fear of Mr. Wagner when you sent him a photograph … of yourself performing … sex on Michael Laramee? Yes or no, ma’am?

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: No.

JULIEANNE KARCASINAS: No further questions, Your Honor.

STEPHANIE FERNANDES: Thank you.

JUDGE: Alright.

Both sides called in domestic violence experts who interviewed Stephanie. Carol Ball testified for the defense saying that Andrew Wagner’s escalating verbal threats and physical violence left Stephanie with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

CAROL BALL: My opinion is that she experiences the symptoms of battered woman syndrome also known as intimate partner violence. … That cycle repeats itself over and over.

And prosecutors called up their expert, David Adams, who concluded that Andrew — not

Stephanie — was the victim of abuse.

DAVID ADAMS: Well, I — I actually didn’t see any evidence that she was fearful of him.

Maura Tansley: I think this case raises some interesting questions about what it means to be a victim. Stephanie is not a sympathetic victim, right. … she is a flawed person and yet she is still a victim and still has a right to act in self-defense. … it’s much easier for us to understand someone as a victim of domestic violence where they have a perfect past, where there’s no other anger issues or anything else, but that’s not what we have.

The defense believes that this case will ultimately come down to whether jurors believe Stephanie intentionally murdered Andrew Wagner. A medical examiner who testified couldn’t say for sure.

Peter Ettenberg: He couldn’t rule out the fact that this was an accident.

And after 10 days of witnesses, the defense presented their closing arguments.

DEFENSE ATTORNEY PETER ETTENBERG: She picked up a knife and said, “Andy, stay away. Stay away.” He didn’t. This time for whatever reason it was too much. And the prosecution hasn’t proved that this wasn’t an accident. And they have not proved that it wasn’t in self-defense. … What the prosecution hasn’t proved is that Stephanie Fernandes is a murderer.

Prosecutor Terry McLaughlin disagreed.

ASSISTANT DA TERRY MCLAUGHLIN: She’s the aggressor. She’s the one with the temper. She’s the one with the mouth. … Ladies and gentlemen, I would suggest to you that this is first-degree murder. Premeditated and planned.

TERRY MCLAUGHLIN: She got him from the side, or she got him from the back from behind. … She grabs the knife, and she stabs him when he’s not lookin’ or he’s not ready for it.

With that argument, the case would go to the jurors.

SELF-DEFENSE, ACCIDENT OR MURDER?

If convicted of first-degree murder, Stephanie Fernandes could face life in prison.

Peter Van Sant: But the question is, did you murder him?

Stephanie Fernandes: No. … It makes me nauseous just to even think of that.

After about 9 hours of deliberation, jurors reached their verdict: guilty of a lesser charge —  voluntary manslaughter —  which carries the possibility of up to 20 years in prison. Shane Bernard and Gayla Bieksha sat on the jury.

Shane Bernard: I think they’re both – that both of them are equally controlling and abusive to each other, you know.

Gayla Bieksha: I agree.

Gayla Bieksha: I think they were both in this vicious cycle that just, they couldn’t stop themselves.

Shane Bernard: He was a more physical abuser where she was more psychological abuse.

Gayla Bieksha: I do believe she didn’t want to kill him, but she did.

As for Fernandes’ claims of self-defense, juror Gayla Bieksha believes Wagner made contact with the knife when Stephanie says he attempted to headbutt her.

Gayla Bieksha: The headbutt was a huge piece for us.

Shane Bernard: Yeah, right.

Gayla Bieksha: We … went off the medical examiner’s report saying that the knife went in from the front. The angle was in from the front and downward.

Shane Bernard: And that she had actually had a stabbing motion. So that, that in a sense, was what ruled out self-defense.

Before sentencing, Andrew Wagner’s family finally got to speak directly to the woman they believe murdered their son and brother.

JILLIAN CRISTALDI: My name is Jillian Cristaldi. I am the sister of Andrew.

My parents and I have waited to speak, to have a voice, to give my brother a voice, and to get him the justice that he deserves, to clear his name from the blatant lies that have been spewed from Stephanie Fernandes and her attorneys’ mouths for over eight years.

When you look at Stephanie Fernandes, you are looking at a face of evil, of someone who gives no consideration for her actions, who is incapable of love, and has shown no remorse or guilt for killing my brother.

Andrew’s mother Melissa Wagner.

MELISSA WAGNER: She took away Andrew’s joy and love of life. She took away all of Andrew’s family and friends. She took away Andrew’s dreams of a family of his own. She took away all of Andrew’s money. She took away Andrew’s dignity and self-respect. And when there was nothing, nothing, nothing left for her to take, she took away Andrew’s life. … I beg you Judge Reardon, and I beg you, I beg you, I beg you, take away the one thing that matters most to her. Take away her freedom for as long as possible. Please, please, please. Thank you.

JUDGE REARDON: I realize that no sentence I impose in this case can do perfect justice.

Judge James Reardon reminds everyone that Stephanie Fernandes was found guilty not of murder, but of voluntary manslaughter.

JUDGE REARDON: Ms. Fernandes is being sentenced for that conviction. Not for her relationship with Andrew Wagner or any other individuals or for her past life.

JUDGE REARDON: I sentence Stephanie Fernandes to a term of not more than 10 years and not less than eight years in state prison.

Peter Van Sant: After all this … According to what you have said, Andrew struck you, chocked you, threatened you with a pistol … do you still have some sort of emotion for this man? Some sort of love for this man?

Stephanie Fernandes: I do. I know it bothers a lotta people. I will always love him.

Stephanie says the night Andy died could have been avoided.

Stephanie Fernandes: Maybe the night wouldn’t have happened if I’d got him help. If I got us counselin’, if I got him therapy.

Peter Van Sant: Angelina, why did this happen?

Angelina Fernandes: Because he was abusive, and my mom was his victim.

Peter Van Sant: But his family blames your mother for that.

Angelina Fernandes: They’re going to believe what they want to believe. … I can’t imagine the pain they’re going through. I don’t think they want to see their deceased son that way. … So, they’re trying to blame my mom for all of the wrong he did towards her.

Angelina is now studying to become a forensic psychologist and she hopes to work with victims in court and with children. Angelina says she looks forward to the day she’ll be able to reunite with her mom.

Angelina Fernandes: When she’s out of jail, she’ll be able to see all of my successes and she’ll be able to see everything that I’ve accomplished. … I want to accomplish all of my dreams so my mom can experience the happiness afterwards.

If you or someone you know is a victim of intimate partner violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233.

Stephanie Fernandes’ trial lawyers say she may be eligible for parole as early as 2026.

Produced by Chuck Stevenson. Hannah Vair is the field producer. Ryan Smith and Tamara Weitzman are the development producers. Annabelle Allen is the broadcast associate. Greg Kaplan, Michelle Harris, and Grayce Arlotta Berner are the editors. Anthony Batson is the senior broadcast producer. Nancy Kramer is the executive story editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer. 

Trending News

Frantic woman in police custody explains her stained clothes: “This is Andrew’s blood”

How Paul Murdaugh testified “from the grave” to help convict his father

What happened when a girl woke up and found her home was a crime scene

Young witness found herself at the scene of a crime

The Poisonous Wife

In:
48 Hours
Andrew Wagner
Fatal Stabbing
Worcester
Stephanie Fernandes

Peter Van Sant

Correspondent, “48 Hours”

Click Here: Wales National Team soccer tracksuit

Saint John Paul II accused of protecting pedophiles, fueling debate over late pope’s “fast-track” to sainthood

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Rome — A documentary hit the airwaves this week in Poland alleging the former pope, Saint John Paul II, protected pedophile priests when he was Archbishop of Krakow in his native country. It has reignited a long-standing debate over whether John Paul II was made a saint too quickly. 

The report aired this week by Polish broadcaster TVN24 accuses John Paul of allowing three priests to continue working in the church in the 1970s despite knowing they had been accused of abusing minors. Two of the priests eventually served prison terms for their crimes.

Calls for John Paul II to be made a saint began at his funeral, on April 2, 2005, when cries of “Santo Subito” (or “sainthood immediately”) erupted from the half million pilgrims in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican. Many held up banners calling for his sainthood.

The cries didn’t fall on deaf ears. Just days after his death, the Vatican began the process of making him a saint. He was “beatified” only six years later and then “canonized” — formally declared a saint — just three years after that. It was the fastest canonization in the history of the Catholic Church.

“Quick canonizations are problematic,” Father Thomas Reese, a Jesuit priest and author, told CBS News. “It is better to have a cooling off period to see if the person’s reputation stands up over time. It takes time to do the research into a person’s life and writings to make sure that his or her life matches the criteria for sainthood.”

Since 1588, when the Vatican established an official saint-making office, the average time between death and sainthood has been about 181 years. That long post-mortem period ensured that would-be saint’s lives were thoroughly scrutinized. 

But the Polish pontiff made significant changes to the church’s sainthood rules during his time as pope, reducing the number of years before the process could even begin following a candidate’s death from 50 to just five. 

But in John Paul’s case, his successor Pope Benedict XVI waived even that reduced period. John Paul also reduced the number of posthumous miracles required for sainthood, from four to two. Finally, he eliminated the role of the “advocatus diaboli,” or devil’s advocate, whose role it had long been to critically examine a candidate’s life and miracles, and to argue against their sainthood, though the Vatican can and does still solicit opposing testimony during the sainthood process.

“John Paul II’s fast-track to sainthood was a product of his own reforms,” John Allen, editor of Catholic website Crux and author of 11 books on Catholicism, told CBS News. “During his papacy, John Paul wanted to make the process faster, cheaper and less adversarial. As a result, he not only canonized and beatified more people than any previous pope, but more than all previous popes combined.” 

The majority of these 482 new saints were figures from the 20th century, “reflecting John Paul’s conviction that the church needed role models of holiness from our own time,” Allen said.

The reforms opened up the Vatican to criticism that it was turning into a “sainthood factory,” and abandoning its long-held critical standards, Allen said, noting that critics had “warned that the waiting period, for example, was intended to prevent a rush to judgment, and that there might be cases of fast-track halos the church would end up regretting. Ironically, some are now saying that about John Paul’s own sainthood.”

Supporters of John Paul’s shortest-ever journey to sainthood say he lived a life of heroic virtue and exceptional holiness, the first requirement for sainthood. He helped bring down communism, repaired relations with Judaism and brought a new generation of worshippers into the church. But his detractors say the pope’s reputation hasn’t withstood the test of time, particularly when it comes to his record on clerical sex abuse.

John Paul II “was indeed rushed to sainthood,” in the opinion of Michael McDonnell, the head of communications for the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP). “He was embraced globally for his travels and credited for helping to end communism in his very Catholic homeland. These achievements provided great cover for him during a time when clergy abuse revelations were steamrolling in the United States and beginning to appear globally.”

The late pope’s canonization, McDonnell said, poured more salt on the still-raw wounds of abuse victims.

Accusations of failures to take action span across John Paul’s 26-year papacy. He refused to believe accusations against Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, the founder of the Legionnaires of Christ order and one of the church’s greatest fundraisers. Those accusations started surfacing in the late 1970s and continued for decades. Maciel was eventually found to have sexually abused minors and seminarians, and to have fathered several children, who he also abused. 

In 2004, two years after disgraced Boston archbishop Cardinal Bernard Law was forced to resign because he’d protected pedophile priests, John Paul appointed him to a prestigious post in Rome. 

In 2020, in a stunning admission, the Catholic church said John Paul II had ignored warnings about former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick from as far back as 1999, instead raising him to the powerful position of Archbishop of Washington D.C. McCarrick has since been defrocked and is under criminal prosecution in Massachusetts for alleged sexual abuse of minors.

“Canonization does not mean that the person was perfect, that they never did anything wrong, that they never sinned,” said Reese. “They are people of their times with many of the blind spots and even prejudices of their times. Many aspects of their lives can be admired and imitated while at the same time recognizing that they made mistakes and even sinned.”

Allen said canonization was “a finding that despite whatever human failures or limitations in judgment his papacy may have reflected, there was nevertheless a genuine holiness of life about the person of the pope. Undoubtedly, supporters of John Paul II will say the same thing vis-à-vis his record on the abuse crisis.”

Trending News

Girl who went missing from a mall in 2018 found in Mexico

6 killed, including unborn baby, in Jehovah’s Witness hall shooting, police say

King Charles III gives his brother Edward the Duke of Edinburgh title

Harry and Meghan christen daughter

Disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 subject of new Netflix series

In:
Religion
Pope John Paul II
Catholic Church

Click Here: Paul Pogba Jersey Sale

Ce soir, Jarry parle aux fantômes ! Que vaut la comédie policière A côté de ses pompes, à voir sur France 2 ?

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Ce mercredi soir, France 2 nous emmène dans une entreprise de pompes funèbres avec la diffusion, à 21h10, de la fiction "A côté de ses pompes". On vous dit ce qu’on a pensé de ce nouveau téléfilm policier avec Jarry en flic, fils de croque-mort.

De quoi ça parle ?

A côté de ses pompes est adaptée de Der bestatter (“Le croque-mort” en allemand), une série policière qui a connu sept saisons en Suisse entre 2013 et 2019.

Cette adaptation raconte l’histoire de Jeff Lesquint, fils de croque-mort, qui possède, depuis l’enfance, ce que beaucoup considèrent comme un don, mais que lui voit plutôt comme une véritable malédiction : lorsqu’il se retrouve face à des personnes décédées, il est capable d’interagir avec elles.

Toujours est-il que cette faculté a entièrement conditionnée sa vie. N’ayant jamais voulu travailler avec son père Octave dans l’entreprise de pompes funèbres familiale, Jeff est devenu policier. Seulement, sa brillante carrière a connu un violent coup d’arrêt lorsque Jeff a tiré à bout portant sur un cadavre.

Le jour où Jeff apprend que son père est mort chez une escort-girl, il sent très vite qu’il s’agit d’une mise en scène. Il tente alors d’en parler à Vincent, son collègue et ex-compagnon, mais sans résultat. Jeff se retrouve donc à la fois à devoir gérer les pompes funèbres Lesquint au bord de la faillite et à enquêter en secret sur la mort de son père. Est-ce que cette épreuve va enfin permettre à Jeff de réussir à vivre avec sa faculté ?

C’est avec qui ?

L’un des atouts d’A côté de ses pompes est incontestablement son casting. En effet, le rôle principal de la série est campé par l’humoriste et animateur télé Jarry, déjà vu sur le petit écran dans Les bracelets rouges (saison 2, 2019), A tes côtés (2020), Noël à tous les étages (2021), ou encore Belle, belle, belle (2021).

Pour jouer son père de fiction, Jarry peut compter sur Francis Perrin, un acteur déjà bien connu du public de France Télévisions pour avoir porté la série policière Mongeville pendant huit saisons sur France 3 entre 2013 et 2021.

À côté de ses pompes

Sortie :

13 décembre 2023

|
1h 30min

De
Nathalie Lecoultre

Avec
Jarry,
Francis Perrin,
Théo Fernandez

Presse
3,4

Le public de TF1 n’est pas non plus en reste, avec Catherine Benguigui (Mona Caron dans Demain nous appartient depuis 2020), Kévin Levy (Bruno Paoletti dans Demain nous appartient depuis 2022) ou Kathy Packianathan (Deva Syed dans Ici tout commence depuis 2020).

Sont également présent·e·s à leurs côtés : Marie-Christine Adam (Sous le soleil, Nina, Or de lui), Théo Fernandez (Les Tuche, Stalk, Gaston Lagaffe), ainsi qu’Eric Naggar.

Ça vaut le coup d’œil ?

On s’attendait à voir une sorte de Ghost Whisperer à la française ou une déclinaison de HPI chez les pompes funèbres. Finalement, on en est assez loin. D’abord, parce que la promesse d’origine n’est pas tout à fait respectée : le pitch du téléfilm nous vend un héros capable de parler aux mort·e·s alors que cette faculté est, en réalité, anecdotique, en dehors de deux ou trois hallucinations grâce auxquelles il échange quelques mots avec son père récemment défunt.

Pour le reste, A côté de ses pompes démontre à plusieurs reprises qu’il a tout pour être un bon téléfilm mais que son potentiel est, hélas, tantôt mal tantôt sous-exploité. L’enquête, peu crédible, semble, par exemple, servir davantage de prétexte pour créer tout un tas de situations et de dialogues comiques qui relèvent bien souvent du loufoque ou de la facilité.

Click Here: wallabies rugby merchandise

L’histoire d’amour entre Jeff et Vincent est, elle, quelque peu rafraîchissante en termes de représentation, de part le fait qu’elle s’inscrive dans un milieu réputé pour son homophobie (la police) et que certains éléments ou rebondissements scénaristiques sont assez rares pour être soulignés (comme la cause de la séparation du couple et le sort qu’il connaît au terme du téléfilm). Pour autant, cette relation n’apporte rien tant son traitement est rapide et reste à la surface des choses.

Et cet élément de l’intrigue n’est, d’ailleurs, pas le seul à souffrir de ce défaut. A trop vouloir en garder sous le pied pour une potentielle suite qui transformerait ce téléfilm en série (comme cela s’est déjà vu par le passé, par exemple avec Clem sur TF1), A côté de ses pompes peine à aller au bout des choses. Ce téléfilm pourrait ainsi souffrir de la comparaison qui sera faite avec RIP, la nouvelle mini-série de TF1 portée par Claudia Tagbo et diffusée courant 2024, qui tentera également le pari original de rendre l’univers des pompes funèbres plus chaleureux et drôle.

A côté de ses pompes surprend, malgré tout, par moments, notamment avec l’équipe des pompes funèbres Lesquint, composée du comptable Gaspard, de l’employée Simone, du thanatopracteur Franck et de la chargée de marketing Myriam, quatre personnages hauts en couleur que l’on prend plaisir à découvrir et qui éclipseraient presque le personnage principal et héritier de l’entreprise de pompes funèbres, Jeff.

Au bout du compte, le téléfilm permet certes de passer une soirée divertissante mais laisse quelque peu sur sa faim. A côté de ses pompes est un téléfilm à découvrir ce mercredi 13 décembre à 21h10 sur France 2.

AEW star suffers injury during Dynamite match

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Click:cnc prototyping

Click:ecommerce web design

SPOTLIGHTED PODCAST ALERT (YOUR ARTICLE BEGINS A FEW INCHES DOWN)…

Rebel suffered an injury during her match on last night’s episode of AEW Dynamite. Fightful is reporting that the injury is a dislocated knee.

On the show, Rebel teamed with Britt Baker to take on Nyla Rose and Vickie Guerrero. Baker and Rebel won the match after Guerrero tapped out to Baker’s Lock Jaw.

According to the Fightful report, AEW was hopeful that the injury would not require surgery.

CATCH-UP: Cody & Brandi Rhodes announce birth of daughter on Instagram

  • aew
  • AEW Dynamite
  • all elite wrestling
  • REBEL

Click Here: aviron bayonnais rugby jerseys

Podcast host and husband shot and killed by stalking suspect in Washington state home invasion, police say

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

A podcast host and her husband were shot and killed in a home invasion in Redmond, Washington, early Friday morning by a man who had been stalking the woman, police said. The suspect was also found dead in the home.

According to Redmond police, at about 1:45 a.m. local time, officers were dispatched to a report of shots fired at the couple’s home. They arrived to find three people inside with gunshot wounds. All three died at the scene, police said.

Redmond police spokesperson Jill Green confirmed to CBS News in an email that the two victims were married and resided in the home. Their names have not been released. 

The mother of one of the two victims, who also lived in the home, had escaped unhurt and reported the shooting, Green told CBS affiliate KIRO-TV.

“It was reported by the mother who lived in the residence,” Green said. “She had escaped from the home and called 911.”

According to police, the female victim hosted a podcast which the suspect, identified as 38-year-old Ramin Khodakaramrezaei, had listened to. Green told CBS News that Khodakaramrezaei was a truck driver from Texas. 

At some point, Khodakaramrezaei reached out to her, they began communicating and then became friends, police said.

However, “things escalated,” prompting her to file a “no-contact order against him,” police said in a statement.

Prior to Friday’s fatal shooting, police had been aware of the stalking case and had tried to assist the family, Green told KIRO-TV.  She said there was a warrant out for Khodakaramrezaei before the attack, but investigators had been unable to locate him.

“They (police) were working with the family, and telling them to be safe, and giving them tips and telling them to call at any time,” Green said. “This is the worst possible outcome of a stalking situation.”

Trending News

Man convicted of killing Kristin Smart in 1996 sentenced to 25 years to life

Money can buy happiness — up to a point, study finds

Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse shocks customers and investors

Girl who went missing from a mall in 2018 found in Mexico

What happened when a girl woke up and found her home was a crime scene

In:
Home Invasion
Fatal Shooting
Washington

Click Here: newcastle knights rugby store

Royal Mint unveils first coins featuring King Charles III

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Britain’s Royal Mint has unveiled the first coins to feature the portrait of King Charles III. Britons will begin to see Charles’ image on their change in December, as 50-pence coins depicting him enter circulation.

The new monarch’s effigy was created by British sculptor Martin Jennings, and has been personally approved by Charles, the Royal Mint said Friday. In keeping with tradition, the king’s portrait faces to the left — the opposite direction to his mother’s, Queen Elizabeth II.

“Charles has followed that general tradition that we have in British coinage, going all the way back to Charles II actually, that the monarch faces in the opposite direction to their predecessor,” said Chris Barker at the Royal Mint Museum.

Charles is depicted without a crown. A Latin inscription surrounding the portrait translates to “King Charles III, by the Grace of God, Defender of the Faith.”

A separate memorial 5-pound coin remembering the life and legacy of Elizabeth will be released Monday. One side of this coin features Charles, while the reverse side features two new portraits of Elizabeth side by side.

Based in south Wales, the Royal Mint has depicted Britain’s royal family on coins for over 1,100 years, documenting each monarch since Alfred the Great.

“When first we used to make coins, that was the only way that people could know what the monarch actually looked like, not in the days of social media like now,” said Anne Jessopp, chief executive of the Royal Mint. “So the portrait of King Charles will be on each and every coin as we move forward.”

Jennings, the sculptor, said the portrait was sculpted from a photo of Charles.

“It is the smallest work I have created, but it is humbling to know it will be seen and held by people around the world for centuries to come,” he said.

Charles acceded to the throne Sept. 8 upon the death of his mother, Britain’s longest-reigning monarch, who died at age 96.

Around 27 billion coins bearing Elizabeth II’s image currently circulate in the United Kingdom. All will remain legal tender and be in active circulation, to be replaced over time as they become damaged or worn.

The Royals

More

Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s titles updated on U.K. royal website

Prince Harry and Meghan’s daughter christened Princess Lilibet Diana

Harry and Meghan won’t say yet if they’ll be at his dad’s coronation

Harry and Meghan asked to vacate their U.K. royal residence

Controversial crown won’t be worn at King Charles III coronation

More

In:
King Charles III
Queen Elizabeth II
United Kingdom

Click Here: Essendon Bombers guernsey

125 die as tear gas triggers crush at Indonesia soccer match

Posted on by A2ZWEBDESIGNSUSA

Police firing tear gas after an Indonesian soccer match in an attempt to stop violence triggered a disastrous crush of fans making a panicked, chaotic run for the exits, leaving at least 125 people dead, most of them trampled upon or suffocated.

Attention immediately focused on police crowd-control measures at Saturday night’s match between host Arema FC of East Java’s Malang city and Persebaya Surabaya. Witnesses described officers beating them with sticks and shields before shooting tear gas canisters directly into the crowds.

It was among the deadliest disasters ever at a sporting event. President Joko Widodo ordered an investigation of security procedures, and the president of FIFA called the deaths “a dark day for all involved in football and a tragedy beyond comprehension.” While FIFA has no control over domestic games, it has advised against the use of tear gas at soccer stadiums.

Brawls are common among rival Indonesian soccer fans, so much so that the organizer had banned Persebaya supporters from Arema’s stadium. But violence still broke out when the home team lost 3-2 and some of the 42,000 Arema fans, known as “Aremania,” threw bottles and other objects at players and soccer officials.

Witnesses said the fans flooded the Kanjuruhan Stadium pitch and demanded that Arema management explain why, after 23 years of undefeated home matches against Persebaya, this one ended in a defeat.

At least five police vehicles were toppled and set ablaze outside the stadium. Riot police responded by firing tear gas, including toward the stadium’s stands, causing panic among the crowd.

“The stadium turned into a smoke-filled battleground when police fired tear gas,” said Rizky, who goes by one name. He came with his cousin to watch the game.

“I felt hot and stinging in my eyes, I couldn’t see clearly while my head was dizzy and everything went dark … I passed out,” he said. When he woke up, he was already in the emergency room. He said his cousin died because of head injuries.

“We wanted to entertain ourselves by watching a football match, but we got disaster,” he said.

Another spectator, Ahmad Fatoni, said police had started beating the fans with sticks and shields, and they fought back.

“Officers fired tear gas directly at spectators in the stands, forcing us to run toward the exit,” he said. “Many victims fell because of shortness of breath and difficulty seeing due to tear gas and were trampled.”

He said he climbed the roof of the stands and only came down when the situation calmed.

Click Here: soccer tracksuits

Others suffocated and were trampled as hundreds of people ran to the exit to avoid the tear gas. In the chaos, 34 died at the stadium, including two officers, and some reports include children among the casualties.

“Some were trampled, some fell down and some got hit,” Rian Dwi Cahyono told Sky News from the hospital, where he was being treated for an injured arm. Asked what triggered the panic, he replied: “Tear gas.”

National Police chief Listyo Sigit Prabowo said the death toll had been revised to 125 from 174, after authorities found some of the victims were counted twice. More than 100 were receiving intensive treatment in eight hospitals, 11 of them in critical condition.

East Java police chief Nico Afinta defended the use of tear gas.

“We have already done a preventive action before finally firing the tear gas as (fans) began to attack the police, acting anarchically and burning vehicles,” he told a news conference early Sunday.

Indonesia’s soccer association, known as PSSI, suspended the premier soccer league Liga 1 indefinitely in light of the tragedy and banned Arema from hosting soccer matches for the remainder of the season.

Grieving relatives waited for information about their loved ones at Malang’s Saiful Anwar General Hospital. Others tried to identify the bodies laid at a morgue while medical workers put identification tags on the bodies of the victims.

“I deeply regret this tragedy and I hope this is the last soccer tragedy in this country, don’t let another human tragedy like this happen in the future,” Widodo said in a televised speech. “We must continue to maintain sportsmanship, humanity and a sense of brotherhood of the Indonesian nation.”

He ordered the sports minister, the national police chief and the PSSI chair to conduct a thorough evaluation of the country’s soccer and its security procedure.

Youth and Sports Minister Zainudin Amali said the incident “has certainly injured our soccer image.” Indonesia is due to host the 2023 FIFA U-20 World Cup from May 20 to June 11, with 24 participating teams. As the host, the country automatically qualifies for the cup.

In a statement, FIFA President Gianni Infantino expressed condolences on behalf of the global football community, saying “the football world is in a state of shock.” The statement did not mention the use of tear gas.

At the Vatican, Pope Francis said he was praying for “those who have lost their lives and for the wounded following clashes that erupted after a soccer game in Malang, Indonesia.”

The restriction on Persebaya fans from entering the stadium was imposed after clashes between supporters of the two rival teams in East Java’s Blitar stadium in February 2020 caused 250 million rupiah ($18,000) in damage. Brawls were reported outside the stadium during and after the semifinals of the East Java Governor’s Cup, which ended with Persebaya beating Arema 4-2.

Rights groups responded to the tragedy by blaming the use of tear gas in the stadium by police.

Citing FIFA’s stadium safety guidelines against the use of “crowd control gas” by pitch side stewards or police, Amnesty International called on Indonesian authorities to conduct a swift investigation into the use of tear gas and ensure that those who are found to have committed violations are tried in open court and do not merely receive internal or administrative sanctions.

Usman Hamid, executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, said tear gas should only be used to disperse crowds when widespread violence has occurred and other methods have failed. People must be warned that tear gas will be used and allowed to disperse. “No one should lose their lives at a football match,” Hamid said.

Hundreds of soccer fans, mostly wearing black shirts, held a candlelight vigil on Sunday night at Gelora Bung Karno, Indonesia’s largest sport stadium in the capital, Jakarta, for the victims of the disaster. They sang songs they composed to lift the spirits of the grieving Aremanias.

Despite Indonesia’s lack of international accolades in the sport, hooliganism is rife in the soccer-obsessed country where fanaticism often ends in violence, as in the 2018 death of a Persija Jakarta supporter who was killed by a mob of hardcore fans of rival club Persib Bandung in 2018.

Data from Indonesia’s soccer watchdog, Save Our Soccer, showed 78 people have died in game-related incidents over the past 28 years.

Saturday’s game is already among the world’s worst crowd disasters, including the 1996 World Cup qualifier between Guatemala and Costa Rica in Guatemala City where over 80 died and over 100 more were injured. In April 2001, more than 40 people are crushed to death during a soccer match at Ellis Park in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Trending News

Face-slapping turns heads. But is it really a sport?

Carolyn Kindle breaks barriers as first female CEO and president of an MLS team

Rutgers star honors the mentor who helped him find basketball

No charges for retired NBA star Shawn Kemp after drive-by shooting

Trans women can compete in USA Powerlifting, ruling says

In:
Riot
Indonesia
Soccer